Legal Opinion

United States v. Rice & Fielding, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 17, 1923No. 2286PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBarbee., Judge

The merchandise in this case is camel’s-hair noils. The invoice describes it as “camel-hair noils, other than carbonized, made from the hair of the camel,” and states that it has been thoroughly washed and scoured and was free from any contagious disease. In the entry it is described as “camel-hair noils, scoured — combed—sorted,” and it was entered as dutiable at 45 cents per pound.

The collector classified and assessed it at 45 cents per pound under the provisions of the emergency tariff act of May 22, 1921. The importer protested and the Board of General Appraisers, one member dissenting,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smillie & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  2. United States v. Davies Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. Wilkes-Barre Lace Mfg. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Rice & Fielding, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API