Jerome Hafter v. Ruth Farkas and Jonathan Farkas
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
In order to appreciate some of the more extraordinary aspects of this appeal, it is first necessary to recount chronologically the legal proceedings that have resulted in the waste of this court’s time, a waste solely attributable to the unprofessional attitude and conduct of appellant’s counsel herein. We go to the length we do here, although the appeal involves only the sum of $1,034, because this case involves some important considerations in relation to attorneys’ obligations to their clients.
On May 3, 1973, a judgment was issued in favor of Jerome Hafter and against Ruth and Jonathan…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In re KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- In Re GoldsteinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1951
- In re BabcockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Broderick's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1962
- Krohe v. GoldmanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cinema 5, Ltd. v. Cinerama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Fund of Funds, Ltd. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Dunton v. County of SuffolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Gregory HurtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Melamed v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.