Legal Opinion

United States v. Gregory Hurt

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 22, 1976No. 72-2229PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, Circuit Judge:

This case presents uniquely a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in proceedings on a remand which we ordered for investigation of an earlier claim of ineffective assistance of counsel at a criminal trial. Our careful review of the record convinces us that the representation provided for the remand proceedings did not meet constitutional standards. Accordingly, we must remand once again.

I

Following appellant’s conviction on three counts of robbery, 1 we appointed new counsel to represent him on appeal. Counsel briefed and orally argued several…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. HardyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Barrett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  4. Michael Lee Smith v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Joseph J. C. Dicarlo and Ronald C. MacKenzieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API