United States v. Gregory Hurt
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, Circuit Judge:
This case presents uniquely a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in proceedings on a remand which we ordered for investigation of an earlier claim of ineffective assistance of counsel at a criminal trial. Our careful review of the record convinces us that the representation provided for the remand proceedings did not meet constitutional standards. Accordingly, we must remand once again.
I
Following appellant’s conviction on three counts of robbery, 1 we appointed new counsel to represent him on appeal. Counsel briefed and orally argued several…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. HardyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Barrett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Michael Lee Smith v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Joseph J. C. Dicarlo and Ronald C. MacKenzieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.