In re Babcock
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
In this disciplinary proceeding, instituted by the Erie County Bar Association, respondent has been found guilty of unprofessional conduct. We have carefully examined the evidence, and have reached the conclusion that the findings of the referee in that regard are justified, and should be confirmed.
*324On or about March 4, 1927, Anna J. Pezold consulted respondent concerning certain marital differences which she was having with her husband. A separation agreement was finally entered into by the parties. In April, 1928, Mr. Pezold was adjudicated a bankrupt, and Mr. Howard T. Saperston was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In the Matter of the Application of KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Ward v. . CraigNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- In re BoehmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- In re MenzelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Heinsheimer v. SchulteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re SebringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Jerome Hafter v. Ruth Farkas and Jonathan FarkasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- In re IversenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Vollgraff v. BlockNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- In re RopieckiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.