Broderick's Case
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.
An attorney has a duty to protect the interests of a client but the legal and ethical methods of performing this duty are solely the responsibility of the attorney. The attorney cannot escape this responsibility with the excuse that he is only following the instructions of his client or that it was the client who sought advice on how to accomplish a questionable transaction. The requirement that an attorney shall not represent conflicting interests nor favor his own interests to the detriment of his client illustrates the fiduciary nature and nondelegable responsibility of an attorney for his…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Ducey v. Doherty (In Re Ducey)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993
- Jerome Hafter v. Ruth Farkas and Jonathan FarkasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- State v. MerskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Ira H. Shinberg v. Paul BrukCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Wehringer's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.