Legal Opinion

In Re Goldstein

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 20, 1951PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Southerland, C. J.:

Pursuant to charges of unprofessional conduct against Louis Goldstein, Esquire, a member of the bar, the Censor Committee of this Court held hearings upon the matter and filed its report with the Court. The report finds that certain of the canons of professional ethics have been violated by the respondent, viz., canon 6, relating to an attorney’s representation of an interest adverse to that of his client; canon 9, relating to direct communications by an attorney to one represented by another attorney; and canon 38, relating to the acceptance of compensation or commissions…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Robertson v. HirshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. Gregory HurtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  2. Schlemm v. SchlemmSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Kolber v. Holyoke Shares, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  4. Jerome Hafter v. Ruth Farkas and Jonathan FarkasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. Abbott Supply Company v. ShockleySuperior Court of Delaware · 1956

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API