Legal Opinion
Quist v. Zerr
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 26, 1941No. 28459PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.
This action was instituted by C. L. Quist, Sr., C. L. Quist, Jr., and Austin H. Quist, doing business as C. L. Quist & Sons, a copartnership, against Casper Zerr, Vincent Zerr and Elizabeth Zerr, his wife, in the superior court for Yakima county, to recover damages claimed to have resulted from the breach of a contract. We quote three paragraphs of the complaint, in order that our subsequent references thereto may be better understandable.
“3. That heretofore and on or about the 14th day of April, 1939, the plaintiffs, at the special' instance and request of the defendants, sold and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bogart v. Pitchless Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Federal Iron & Brass Bed Co. v. HockWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Findley v. FindleyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Keisel v. BredickWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Snohomish River Boom Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Distrillers Distributing Corporation v. J. C. Millett Co., a Corporation, D/B/A Key Distributing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Sunset Oil Co. v. VertnerWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Hole v. Unity Petroleum Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Pappas v. ZerwoodisWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Mading v. McPhadenWashington Supreme Court · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.