Legal Opinion

Federal Iron & Brass Bed Co. v. Hock

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1906No. 5996PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for Pierce county, Huston, J., entered July 18, 1905, upon tbe verdict of a jury rendered in favor of tbe plaintiff, in an action on promissory notes-.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

— This appeal is from a judgment rendered in two suits which, were consolidated for the purpose- of trial, said actions being based upon promissory notes. The alleged facts involved are substantially as follows: The respondent, a manufacturer of iron beds in Illinois, having no representative or market for its goods in the northwest, entered into a contract with the appellant, a jobber and manufacturer’s agent in Tacoma, about May 1st, 1903 (said contract covering the period to January 1, 1904, after which a new contract was to be made if mutually desirable), whereby appellant should sell…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Skagit Railway & Lumber Co. v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Goldhammer v. DyerColorado Court of Appeals · 1895

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Mall Tool Co. v. Far West Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Manss-Owens Co. v. H. S. Owens & SonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  3. Larsen v. Walton Plywood Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API