Legal Opinion

Hole v. Unity Petroleum Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1942No. 28660PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDriver, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for the breach of a written contract with defendant corporation, which operates a gasoline refinery at Kalispell, Montana. The material provisions of the contract, dated October 21, 1940, may be summarized as follows:

The plaintiff represented that he was the owner of a lease on a tract of land in the city of Spokane and agreed to assign the lease to defendant. Plaintiff further represented that he was the owner of a Studebaker truck and Gunderson semitrailer, equipped with a tank of forty-five hundred gallons capacity and a pump, for hauling…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Webster v. BeauWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Bogart v. Pitchless Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Federal Iron & Brass Bed Co. v. HockWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Warner v. Channell Chemical Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Florence Fish Co. v. Everett Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Larsen v. Walton Plywood Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Kadiak Fisheries Co. v. Murphy Diesel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Farm Crop Energy, Inc. v. Old National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Ingersol v. Seattle-First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API