Legal Opinion
Herbert v. Anstine
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 14, 1930No. 2878PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WADDILL, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court of the United States for the District of Maryland, entered on January 2, 1929, directing the appellants to restore to the appellee a permit to sell intoxicating liquor within the limitations of the law, together with the privileges connected therewith, and abating certain taxes assessed against appellee.
On August 13, 1927, the appellee, Clarence L. Anstine, applied for a renewal of his druggist’s permit, serial No. Md-I-361, authorizing him to secure and dispose of intoxicating liquor within the limitations of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ma-King Products Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hartsville Oil Mill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Yudelson v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
- Stein v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
- Blair v. GraupnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Quitt v. StoneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- De Luca v. StoneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1930
- Frank J. Smith & Son v. McCampbellDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1931
- Quitt v. StoneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1930