Legal Opinion
De Luca v. Stone
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided December 9, 1930No. 1770PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM C. COLEMAN, District J udge.
This case arises upon a bill to review the action of the local Prohibition Administrator in revoking complainant’s permit, dated May 18, 1929, to withdraw specially denatured alcohol in quantities not to exceed four hundred wine gallons per thirty day period, for use in the manufacture of hair tonic and toilet preparations.
The bill was filed pursuant to section 9 of title 2 of the National Prohibition Act (27 1JSCA § 21). In accordance with the provisions of the same section, complainant, on July 23, 1929, was cited to appear before the local Commissioner…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Ma-King Products Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hartsville Oil Mill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Shapiro v. LyleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1929
- Herbert v. AnstineCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wischhusen v. Spirits Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- Meinwald v. DoranDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1932