Legal Opinion

Hartsville Oil Mill v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 12, 1926No. 609PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

On February 5, 1923, a bill (S. 4479) was introduced in the Senate authorizing and directing the Secretary of the Treasury to pay to two hundred and eighty-five named persons, firms and corporations, including the appellant, “ which entered into contracts with the United States of America through the ■ agency of the United States Ordnance Department, which contracts were cancelled by said Ordnance Department, the several sums set opposite their names.”' By Senate Resolution of March 3, 1923, the bill, with accompanying documents, was referred to the Court of Claims for.consideration and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hackley v. HeadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. United States v. Utah, Nevada & California Stage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Silliman v. United States. United States v. SillimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. United States v. Child & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1871

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. McCallum Highlands, Ltd. v. Washington Capital Dus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. Blodgett v. BlodgettOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Vance v. TerrazasSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Continental Bank v. Barclay Riding Academy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. Totem Marine Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API