Legal Opinion

Quitt v. Stone

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 13, 1931No. 3089PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the court below dismissing a bill brought to review the action of the federal prohibition administrator for the Seventh district in refusing to renew a permit for the use of specially denatured alcohol under section 4 of title 2 of the Act of Oct. 28,1919, e. 85 (27 USCA § 13). The complainant was Dr. Wm. Quitt, a dentist of Baltimore, who is engaged, under the name of the Three Flower Chemical Company in the manufacture of toilet preparations. He held a permit expiring December 31, 1929, authorizing the use of 5,550 gallons of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Silberschein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Ma-King Products Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Campbell Fed. Prohibition Administrator v. Galeno Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Yudelson v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
  5. Campbell v. W. H. Long & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wischhusen v. Spirits Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  2. Burnet v. HanlonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
  3. Morgenthau v. Mifflin Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API