Schweiner v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtWedemeyer, P.J.
Ervin Schweiner, Christine Schweiner, Crouse-Hinds, and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company appeal from a summary judgment granted to Thiem Corporation and its insurer, Aetna Casualty & Surety Company. The basis of the judgment is the immunity provided an employer (Thiem) from an employee’s common-law tort action under sec. 102.03(2), Stats., of the Wisconsin Worker’s Compensation Act. Because we conclude that the principle of immunity embodied in sec. 102.03(2) is inapplicable to the facts of this case, we reverse the judgment and order the claims asserted against Thiem reinstated.
FACTUAL…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Billy v. Consolidated Machine Tool Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Jenkins v. SabourinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Tift v. Forage King Industries, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Village of Brown Deer v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Gerger v. CampbellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Gurry v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Riccitelli v. BroekhuizenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Davis v. Celotex Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
- Corr v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Henning v. General Motors Assembly DivisionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.