Legal Opinion

Tift v. Forage King Industries, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1982No. 80-1724PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The question posed in this case is whether a business corporation which acquired substantially all of the assets of a predecessor sole proprietorship but which is substantially the same business organization and manufactures an almost identical product as its predecessor may be liable for injuries caused by a defective product manufactured by the predecessor. The circuit court for Barron county, JAMES C. EATON, Circuit Judge, concluded that the successor corporation could not be liable and granted the motion of the defendants for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint.

The court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Raymond Leannais and Catherine Leannais v. Cincinnati, Incorporated and Cincinnati-Forte Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Martin v. Abbott LaboratoriesWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. David Dayton v. Peck, Stow and Wilcox Co. (Pexto)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  3. Pendergrass v. Card Care, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Fish v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Schweiner v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API