Legal Opinion

Village of Brown Deer v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1962PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

All of the six annexations involved here were prosecuted under sec. 62.07 (1) (a), Stats. 1955. This statute provided in part that:

“(1) Annexation procedure. Territory adjacent to any city may be annexed to such city in the manner following:
“(a) A petition therefor shall be presented to the council 1. signed by a majority of the electors in such adjacent territory and by the owners of one half of the real estate within the limits of the territory proposed to be annexed, or 2. if no electors reside in the said adjacent territory signed by the owners of one half of taxable property therein…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Village of Brown Deer v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  2. DeBauche v. City of Green BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Whitten v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Jacobs v. Queen Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Hagenah v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Schweiner v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  3. Farmers Union Oil Co. of New England v. MaixnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Franklin Savings Ass'n v. Director of the Office of Thrift SupervisionDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990
  5. Tower Oaks Boulevard, LLC v. ProcidaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API