Legal Opinion
Bleon v. Emery
Utah Supreme Court
Decided September 18, 1922No. 3849PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
The plaintiff was charged in the city court of Salt Lake City with having violated the provisions of title 69, Comp. Laws Utah 1917, constituting sections 3970 to 3990, and with violating that title as amended by chapter 78, Laws Utah 1919, and by chapters 81, 82, and 83, Laws Utah 1921. Reference will hereinafter be made to the particular provisions of the foregoing chapters which are in question here. A warrant was duly issued upon the complaint filed as aforesaid, and plaintiff was arrested and taken into custody, and was thus restrained of his liberty by the defendant as sheriff of Salt…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Matter of Application of SchulerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Park v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Jackson v. NeffSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
- Kane v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- House of Tobacco, Inc. v. CalvertTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Woco Pep Co. of Montgomery v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Carter v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1939
- Solberg v. DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Thompson v. Harris, Warden. Demmick v. SameUtah Supreme Court · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.