Legal Opinion

Carter v. State Tax Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1939No. 6009PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRATT, Justice.

The Interstate Motor Lines, a partnership, paid under protest certain registration fees required by Sections 132 and 133 of Chapter 46, Laws of Utah 1935. They filed complaint for the return of those fees upon the ground, so far as argued in the briefs, that Section 133 was arbitrary and discriminatory as against them, thus violating the 14th amendment to the Constitution of the United States, U. S. C. A., and also Section 24, Article I, of the Constitution of Utah. This constitutional section provides that all laws of a general nature shall have uniform operation.

The Utah…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. New York Rapid Transit Corp. v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Morf v. BingamanSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Ogilvie v. HaileyTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  5. The People v. Deep Rock Oil Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Malan v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. House of Tobacco, Inc. v. CalvertTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Gregory v. ShurtleffUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  4. National Cable Television Ass'n v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  5. State Tax Commission v. Department of FinanceUtah Supreme Court · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API