Jackson v. Neff
Supreme Court of Florida
Appealed from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, C. J.
On a writ error in hateas corpus proceeding, the only question presented for determination is the validity of the following statute of 1911:
*328“Chapter 6212 — (No. 93).
AN ACT to License Automobiles and Other Motor Driven, Vehicles Using the Public Roads or Highways in the-State of Florida Either for Hire or Otherwise.
Be it Enacted by the Legislature o,f the State of Florida:
Section 1. The owner or operator of every automobile- and other motor driven vehicle operating in this State more than fifteen days when used for hire, charter or-when charge is made for use thereof in any manner or form…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Brown-Forman Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Keeney v. Comptroller of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Hardee v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Harder's Fire Proof Storage & Van Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Amos v. MathewsSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Lainhart v. CattsSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Klemm v. DavenportSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Hiers v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
- In re RobinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.