Legal Opinion
McLaughlin v. Bayer Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 22, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NOS. 14-7315, 14-7316, 14-7317, 14-7318, 15-384PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Padova, Judge.
Five individual Plaintiffs have initiated separate actions against Bayer Corp., Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Essure, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals and Bayer A.G. (collectively, “Bayer”). Each action asserts twelve. claims for relief, seeking compensation for injuries that the Plaintiff suffered in connection with her use of Bayer’s female birth control device known as “Essure.” The five cases were consolidated for resolution of pre-trial motions.. In each of the five cases, Bayer has filed the same Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Under Federal Rule of…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Smith v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Bors v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Williams v. Bayer Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Hu v. Herr Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Silver v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.