Globe Yarn Mills v. Bilbrough
New York Court of Common Pleas
Appeal from city court, general term. Three actions by the .Globe Yarn Mills against William H. Bilbrough and others. An order denying a motion to vacate the attachments was affirmed at general term of the city court of New York, (19 N. Y. Supp. 176.) and defendants appeal. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtPryor, J.
The grounds upon which the orders are impugned are, as to action No. 3, that it is beyond the jurisdiction of the court, and no evidence appears to warrant the attachment. Action No.. 3 is on a negotiable note made at Cohoes, and payable at Troy. The cause of action did not arise in the city of New York. Neither of the parties resides here, nor was the summons served in the city. Appellants argue that because, upon this condition of fact, the court of common pleas would not have jürisdiction of the action, it is a necessary inference that the city court also is without jurisdiction. But the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crowns v. VailNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Essex County National Bank v. JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1891
- Ellison v. BernsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by13 opinions
- Trecartin v. Mahony-Troast Construction Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Sun Dial Corp. v. RideoutNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Stewart v. LymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Rothman v. SilberNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Colon v. Pennsylvania Greyhound LinesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.