Legal Opinion
Colon v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 6, 1953PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
27 N.J. Super. 280 (1953)
99 A.2d 181
LEOCADIO COLON, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
PENNSYLVANIA GREYHOUND LINES, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided August 6, 1953.
Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman, Spitzer & Sills for plaintiffs.
Messrs. Cox & Walburg for defendant Michael F. Hawrusik.
CLAPP, J.S.C.
Motion is made to dismiss this action as against one of the defendants on the ground that he was not served. Service was purportedly made under R.S. 39:7-1 to 39:7-3, which, in connection with auto accidents, provide for service of process upon nonresidents through the agency of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Carlson v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- Wagner v. ScurlockCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
- Hendershot v. FerkelOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Bigham v. . FoorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Cunningham v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Byrd v. Ontario Freight Lines Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Clark v. ReichmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- Goldenberg v. SeberskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- State Ex Rel. Lesliy v. AronsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
- Rogers v. DubacNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.