Legal Opinion
Sun Dial Corp. v. Rideout
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 6, 1954PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
29 N.J. Super. 361 (1954)
102 A.2d 90
SUN DIAL CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CARL D. RIDEOUT, JAMES L. RIDEOUT, ROBERT A. WHITFIELD, NANCY ORI WHITFIELD AND PRECISION MARKING CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 5, 1953.
Decided January 6, 1954.
Before Judges CLAPP, GOLDMANN and EWART.
Mr. Ira Milton Jones, of the Wisconsin Bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Davidson & Miniutti, attorneys).
Mr. Walter D. Van Riper argued the cause for respondents…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Vulcan Detinning Co. v. American Can Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
- Stone v. GossSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
- Carver v. HarrNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
- Taylor Iron & Steel Co. v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Morrison v. WoodburySupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Electro-Craft Corp. v. Controlled Motion, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Wexler v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Water Services, Inc. And Farris Chemical Company v. Tesco Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Futurecraft Corp. v. Clary Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Mid-America Marketing Corp. v. Dakota Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.