Crowns v. Vail
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, Hew York county. Action by George H. Crowns against James W. Vail and William Landolt. Plaintiff obtained an attachment against the property of defendants, which was vacated on motion of a subsequently attaching creditor, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Bbunt, P. J.
This motion was made by a subsequently attaching creditor to set aside an attachment which had been granted in this case against *325the property of the defendants. The ground of the motion was the infirmity of the affidavit upon which the .attachment was granted. The affidavit was made by one of the members of the firm who are attorneys of record for the plaintiff in this action. It was positive in its terms, alleging a cause of action ; that the defendants were non-residents of the state, and that the sum claimed was due and owing from the defendants to the plaintiff, over and above all…
2Cited by30 opinions
- Hoormann v. Climax Cycle Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Ladenburg v. Commercial Bank of NewfoundlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Bremer v. RingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Globe Yarn Mills v. BilbroughNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
- J. H. Mohlman Co. v. LandwehrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.