Legal Opinion

Trecartin v. Mahony-Troast Construction Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 6, 1952PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

18 N.J. Super. 380 (1952)

87 A.2d 349

JULIA TRECARTIN, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM UPON THE ESTATE OF RICHARD TRECARTIN, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

MAHONY-TROAST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 18, 1952.

Decided March 6, 1952.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and WM. J. BRENNAN, JR.

Mr. Marshall Crowley argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Shaw, Hughes & Pindar, attorneys; Mr. Charles H. Hoens, Jr., on the brief).

Mr. Maurice C. Brigadier argued the cause for respondent (Mr.…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Koenig v. Patrick Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Broderick v. Cauldwell-Wingate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Bacak v. HogyaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  4. Meny v. CarlsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  5. Evers v. DavisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Funk v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Wolczak v. National Electric Products Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Gibilterra v. Rosemawr Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  4. Mavrikidis v. PetulloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  5. Bergquist v. PentermanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API