Legal Opinion

Dennehy v. City of Gresham

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1992No. OTC 3175; SC S39249PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

This is a direct appeal from a judgment of the Oregon Tax Court. Pursuant to ORS 305.583, 1 14 interested taxpayers petitioned for a determination of the effect of Article XI, section lib, of the Oregon Constitution (commonly referred to as “Measure 5”) on a storm drain user charge imposed by the City of Gresham. The Tax Court held that the charge was a “tax” as defined by Article XI, section lib, and thus subject to the limits of that provision. Neither party has sought review of that decision on the merits. Petitioners also requested an award of attorney fees from the Tax Court under the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Deras v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Lewis v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Samuel v. FrohnmayerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. City of Portland v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Dennehy v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Swett v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State Ex Rel. Pend-Air Citizen's Committee v. City of PendletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Leppanen v. Lane Transit DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. Tanner v. Oregon Health Sciences UniversityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API