Legal Opinion

Leppanen v. Lane Transit District

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 1, 2002No. 12-00-009315; A111022PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Plaintiff, a City of Eugene resident, attempted to solicit initiative petition signatures at the downtown Eugene transit station. The Lane Transit District (LTD) prohibited him from doing that, invoking an ordinance that, among other things, prohibits solicitation of initiative petition signatures in the vicinity of a bus boarding platform area. Plaintiff then initiated this action challenging the constitutionality of the ordinance, arguing that it violates his right to initiate legislation reserved in Article IV, section 1, of the Oregon Constitution, as well his rights of free expression…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Priest v. PearceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Deras v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bates v. Oregon Health AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  2. Couey v. ClarnoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. Freedom Socialist Party v. BradburyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Freedom Socialist Party v. BradburyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. State v. MoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API