Legal Opinion

Samuel v. Frohnmayer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1989No. TC 137346; CA A47340; SC S36166PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

This case raises questions concerning the scope of a trial court’s authority to provide “further relief’ to a successful party in a declaratory judgment proceeding. The pertinent statute, ORS 28.080, provides in part:

“Further relief based on a declaratory judgment or decree may be granted whenever necessary or proper.”

Specifically, the issue is whether an award of attorney fees to the winning party for expenses incurred in pursuing the declaratory judgment may be “proper” further relief under the statute, when only the statute itself is relied upon as the source of the court’s authority to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Deras v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Van Gordon v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. First National Bank v. MaladyOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Beaver v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Samuel v. FrohnmayerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Hawkins v. City of La GrandeOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Swett v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Dennehy v. City of GreshamOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Dennehy v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API