Legal Opinion

City of Portland v. Smith

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1992No. OTC 3156; SC S39350PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*182PETERSON, J.

In November 1990, as the result of an initiative, Oregon voters passed a constitutional amendment relating to property taxation and public school financing, commonly referred to, then and now, as Measure 5. Or Const, Art XI, § lib. Measure 5 “limits the taxes that may be imposed on any property by limiting tax rates.” Coalition for Equit. School Fund. v. State of Oregon, 311 Or 300, 310, 811 P2d 116 (1991). Measure 5 also provided that certain property taxes be exempt from its limitations:

“(3) The [property tax rate] limitations of subsection (1) of this section apply to all taxes…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Deras v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. WagnerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Coalition for Equitable School Funding, Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Dennehy v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Dennehy v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wisconsin v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. Medical Technology & Research AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. Shilo Inn Portland/205, LLC v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Dennehy v. City of GreshamOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Smith v. Multnomah County Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API