Swett v. Bradbury
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
This application for an award of attorney fees on review arises out of a successful challenge to the constitutionality of Ballot Measure 62 (1998). See Swett v. Bradbury, 333 Or 597, 43 P3d 1094 (2002) (declaring measure unconstitutional because it violated separate-vote requirement of Oregon Constitution). Respondents on review, plaintiffs below (plaintiffs), the successful challengers of the measure, seek an award of attorney fees from the state and from respondents (intervenors below) for plaintiffs’ efforts in securing that outcome in this court. For the reasons that follow, we allow…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Deras v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Vannatta v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Gilbert v. Hoisting & Portable Engineers, Local Union No. 701Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Burke v. Children's Services DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Precision Seed Cleaners v. Country Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- M. K. F. v. MiramontesOregon Supreme Court · 2012
- TVKO v. HowlandOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- Chernaik v. KitzhaberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Andlovec v. SpotoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.