Legal Opinion
Watts v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 14, 1924No. 6 Div. 985PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The suit was on a policy of insurance, and the defense was a lapse for the nonpayment of premiums. At the conclusion of the evidence the hill of exceptions recites:
“At the request of the defendant ’in the case, the following charge, which was in writing, was given to the jury by the court: r ‘If you believe the evidence your verdict must be for the defendant.’ Thereupon the plaintiff, in open court/ and in the presence of the jury, duly and legally excepted to the > charge as given.
“The court further charged the jury as follows: And in accordance with that charge, your verdict will be, “We,…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Tobler v. Pioneer Mining & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Shipp v. SheltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. LovejoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Amerson v. Corona Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- New England Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. McCreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Cummings v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. CarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- State Security Life Insurance Co. v. HensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.