Legal Opinion

Watts v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 14, 1924No. 6 Div. 985PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit was on a policy of insurance, and the defense was a lapse for the nonpayment of premiums. At the conclusion of the evidence the hill of exceptions recites:

“At the request of the defendant ’in the case, the following charge, which was in writing, was given to the jury by the court: r ‘If you believe the evidence your verdict must be for the defendant.’ Thereupon the plaintiff, in open court/ and in the presence of the jury, duly and legally excepted to the > charge as given.
“The court further charged the jury as follows: And in accordance with that charge, your verdict will be, “We,…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Tobler v. Pioneer Mining & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Shipp v. SheltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. LovejoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Amerson v. Corona Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. New England Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. McCreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Cummings v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  4. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. CarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. State Security Life Insurance Co. v. HensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API