Legal Opinion

New England Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 22, 1928No. 3 Div. 830PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

(after stating the facts as above). We are of opinion that furnishing proof of disability to the insurer is made a condition precedent to the waiver of premium payments under the supplemental agreement set out in the special plea above. This agreement declares:

“If the insured * * * shall furnish due proof to the company, at its home office in the city of Boston, that he has become wholly disabled by bodily injury or disease, * * * the company will waive payment of each premium as it thereafter becomes due during the continuance of such disability.”

The intervening clauses name the conditions…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Woodmen Accident Ass'n v. PrattNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  3. New York Life Ins v. AlexanderMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Watts v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Wick v. Western Union Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NY v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. McGifford v. Protective Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. DorrietySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Smith v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  5. Swann v. Atlantic Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API