Legal Opinion

Harris v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 10, 1972No. 6172PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Associate Judge.

This appeal from a conviction for “keepfing] a bawdy or disorderly house * * *, a premises resorted to for homosexual activities”,1 presents a constitutional attack of vagueness on the disorderly house part of the statute as defined by court decision.2 Also, the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged on the ground that no evidence was adduced on the question whether the homosexual conduct described was “subversive of the public morals” — a part of the common-law definition of the disorderly house offense as recognized in Payne v. United States, D.C.Mun.App., 171…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Hattie Mae Ricks v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  3. Jairo Velez-Lozano v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  4. Hudson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. De Forest v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1897

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Muse v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. State v. JING HUA XIAOHawaii Supreme Court · 2010
  3. United States v. McKeanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Gayer v. SchlesingerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  5. Dinkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API