Hattie Mae Ricks v. District of Columbia
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge:
Nearly every state in the Union has ventured to regulate in a criminal context an assortment of conduct characteristically grouped under the denomination “vagrancy.” 1 Congress, in like vein, has enacted the two statutes currently in operation in the District of Columbia commonly referred to as the “general vagrancy” 2 and “narcotic vagrancy” 3 laws. On this appeal we came face-to-face with claims of unconstitutionality directed toward the former. In a companion case, 4 decided today, we deal with similar challenges to the latter.
The legislation now…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- United States v. John M. PoindexterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Manual De J. Gomez v. Jerry v. Wilson, Chief of PoliceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- City of Bellevue v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Chicago v. MoralesIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Akron v. RowlandOhio Supreme Court · 1993
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.