Legal Opinion

Hattie Mae Ricks v. District of Columbia

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 23, 1968No. 20919PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge:

Nearly every state in the Union has ventured to regulate in a criminal context an assortment of conduct characteristically grouped under the denomination “vagrancy.” 1 Congress, in like vein, has enacted the two statutes currently in operation in the District of Columbia commonly referred to as the “general vagrancy” 2 and “narcotic vagrancy” 3 laws. On this appeal we came face-to-face with claims of unconstitutionality directed toward the former. In a companion case, 4 decided today, we deal with similar challenges to the latter.

The legislation now…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. United States v. John M. PoindexterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  2. Manual De J. Gomez v. Jerry v. Wilson, Chief of PoliceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. City of Bellevue v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. City of Chicago v. MoralesIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  5. City of Akron v. RowlandOhio Supreme Court · 1993

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API