Legal Opinion

Gayer v. Schlesinger

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 9, 1974No. Nos. 71-1934, 71-1935 and 72-1820PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

On consideration of appellants’ motions for clarification or correction of the opinion, and of appellees’ opposition filed with respect thereto, it is

Ordered that my concurring opinion filed herein on November 15, 1973, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 172, 490 F.2d 740, is hereby amended as follows:

(Omit first sentence, p. 27 [first sentence of first full paragraph in second column of page 755, 490 F.2d]—add following to fn. 4 [page 755 of 490 F.2d]).

In accordance with appellants’ motion dated January 3, 1974, for clarification of this concurring opinion, it is noted that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jairo Velez-Lozano v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Gayer v. SchlesingerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Richard L. Gayer v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary of Defense, Otto H. Ulrich, Jr. v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary of Defense, Benning Wentworth v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API