De Forest v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
In error to the Police Court of the District of Columbia. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris
This is the first appeal taken to this court from the Police Court of the District of Columbia under the act of Congress of March 2, 1897, authorizing such appeals. By information filed in that court the appellant was charged with keeping and maintaining a common bawdy house; and being by the verdict of a jury found guilty, she has brought her cause here upon exceptions to the rulings of the trial court in the course of the cause. Three of these exceptions have reference to the admission of evidence, six to action of the trial court in the matter of instructions to the jury, and one to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Lincoln v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Cooper v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Noonan v. Caledonia Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Billy G. ByersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- United States v. JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Linkins v. Protestant Episcopal Cathedral Foundation of the District of Columbia Williams v. Protestant Episcopal Cathedral Foundation of the District of Columbia Stone v. Protestant Episcopal Cathedral Foundation of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Skiskowski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.