Legal Opinion

United States v. McKean

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 1975No. 7455PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Associate Judge:

On February 16, 1973, appellees were charged in separate informations with attempted sodomy in violation of D.C.Cole 1973, §§ 22-103 and 22-3502. The trial court granted appellees’ motions to dismiss the informations, ruling that the acts alleged in the informations were engaged in by consenting adults in the privacy of closed cubicles or rooms in the Regency Health Club and thus were outside the proscription of the sodomy statute. This appeal followed, and the government has moved for summary reversal. We grant the motion and reverse.

On the basis of testimony…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Caesar's Health Club v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Oliver T. Carr Management, Inc. v. National Delicatessen, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Neville v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. United States v. BuckDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Neville v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API