Legal Opinion
Krol v. A. V. Tuchy, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 19, 2005No. AC 25141PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The plaintiff, Russell Krol, appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board), claiming that the board improperly concluded that (1) one trial commissioner did not reverse *347the decision of another commissioner and (2) the commissioner’s factual findings were supported by evidence in the record.1 We affirm the decision of the board.
The plaintiff sustained a compensable injury to his back on April 9, 1998. Michael E. Opalak, a neurosurgeon, opined in an April 14, 1999 independent medical report that the plaintiff required treatment with a device known as a TLSO…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- D'Amico v. Department of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Dixon v. United Illuminating Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Gillette v. Town of MonroeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Francis v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
4Cited by4 opinions
- Testone v. C. R. Gibson Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Evanuska v. City of DanburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Anderson v. R & K SPERO CO.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Evanuska v. City of DanburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007