Legal Opinion

Francis v. State

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 14, 1999No. AC 18547PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*91 Opinion

FOTI, J.

The defendant appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) affirming the commissioner’s decision granting the plaintiffs claim for workers’ compensation benefits. On appeal, the defendant claims that the board improperly (1) characterized the plaintiffs injury, (2) assumed the commissioner’s role of fact finder and (3) failed to remand the case to the commissioner to address the defendant’s jurisdictional argument that the plaintiffs claim was not timely filed. We affirm the decision of the board.

The commissioner found the following facts. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Figueroa v. C & S Ball BearingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Fair v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Discuillo v. Stone & WebsterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. Hansen v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Veilleux v. Complete Interior Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Krol v. A. V. Tuchy, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API