Legal Opinion

Newman v. Maricopa County

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 22, 1991No. 1 CA-CV 88-309PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIDEL, Judge.

The trial court granted Maricopa County’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ personal injury suit for failure to state a claim. Plaintiffs appeal and we reverse. The trial court determined — in our view prematurely — that the County owed plaintiffs no duty. We conclude that plaintiffs’ complaint — necessarily accepted as true for the purpose of the motion — sufficiently stated a claim to withstand a motion to dismiss. We additionally conclude that resolution of the question of the County’s duty required a more fully developed record concerning the County’s power and policies…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Ryan v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Luchanski v. Officer J.L. CongroveCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  3. Vasquez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. Wertheim v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. Galati v. Lake Havasu CityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API