Newman v. Maricopa County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIDEL, Judge.
The trial court granted Maricopa County’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ personal injury suit for failure to state a claim. Plaintiffs appeal and we reverse. The trial court determined — in our view prematurely — that the County owed plaintiffs no duty. We conclude that plaintiffs’ complaint — necessarily accepted as true for the purpose of the motion — sufficiently stated a claim to withstand a motion to dismiss. We additionally conclude that resolution of the question of the County’s duty required a more fully developed record concerning the County’s power and policies…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Ryan v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Luchanski v. Officer J.L. CongroveCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Vasquez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Wertheim v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Galati v. Lake Havasu CityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.