Legal Opinion
Hilyar v. Union Ice Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided July 29, 1955No. L. A. 23223PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
— This is an appeal by plaintiff from judgments of nonsuit entered in favor of defendants Charles Irwin Ingram (sued as Charles Irwin Ingerman) and Union Ice Company for damages for personal injuries.
Plaintiff, a 5%-year-old boy, was run over, or hit, and seriously and permanently injured by an ice truck driven by defendant Ingram. The only question involved is whether there was sufficient evidence of negligence on the part of Ingram to permit the ease to go to the jury. A subsidiary question is whether there was sufficient evidence of an agency relationship between defendant Ingram and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Rush v. LagomarsinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Palmquist v. MercerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
- L. D. Reeder Contractors of Arizona, an Arizona Corporation v. Higgins Industries, Inc., a Louisiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Schwartz v. Helms Bakery LimitedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver of San Francisco National Bank v. David M. GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.