Beaver Valley Power Co. v. National Engineering & Contracting Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents a modern version of an age-old problem: reconciling the mutually exclusive interests of riparian landowners. See generally Morton J. Horwitz, The Transformation of American Law 32-53 (1977). Pursuant to a contract with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT), National Engineering & Contracting Co. (National), an Ohio corporation, built a bridge on the Beaver River, downstream from Beaver Valley Power Corp.’s (Beaver Valley) hydroelectric power station. After construction was completed, Beaver Valley, a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Yearsley v. W. A. Ross Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Congini by Congini v. PORTERSVILLE ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1982
- Lobozzo v. Adam Eidemiller, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Shamnoski v. Pg EnergySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- C.C.H. v. Philadelphia Phillies, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- In Re Asbestos Products Liability Lit.(no. Vi)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Conner v. Quality Coach, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Kruppenbacher v. MazzeoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.