Legal Opinion
In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 24, 1982No. MDL 381PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GEORGE C. PRATT, District Judge.
This memorandum and order addresses the following subjects:
I. Dow’s Motion for Reargument.
II. Defendants’ Motion for Entry of Final Judgment or Certification.
III. Dow’s Motion to Amend its Third Party Complaint Against the Government.
IV. Motions by Defendants Riverdale, Ansul, Hooker & Occidental.
V. Motion by Some Plaintiffs’ Counsel for a Steering Committee.
VI. Dow’s Motion to Decertify the Class.
VII. Statute of Limitations.
VIII. The Government Contract Defense.
IX. Narrowing Claims.
X. Discovery.
XI. Class Notice.
I. Dow’s Motion for Reargument.
Dow Chemical…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Yearsley v. W. A. Ross Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Berg v. Reaction Motors DivisionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- Daniel J. Monaco and Denise E. Monaco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation Mdl No. 381Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation Mdl No. 381Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Hercules Incorporated v. The United States, Wm. T. Thompson Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.