Legal Opinion
Kruppenbacher v. Mazzeo
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided September 11, 1990No. 86-CV-40PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER
MUNSON, District Judge.
All defendants in the present action move for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff claims that he was falsely arrested, falsely imprisoned and maliciously prosecuted. Plaintiff alleges that the actions of the defendants deprived him of his constitutional rights and therefore he is entitled to damages under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 1 This court has subject matter jurisdiction under Title 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
BACKGROUND
There is very little dispute regarding the underlying facts of this case. A…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crews v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Hahn v. County of OtsegoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1993
- Pawlicki v. City of IthacaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
- Snow v. Village of ChathamDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2000