Legal Opinion

C.C.H. v. Philadelphia Phillies, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 19, 2008No. 4 EAP 2007PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BAER.

Appellant T.G., a minor girl, was 11 years of age at the time she was allegedly sexually assaulted by Appellees Joseph Fabrizzio, John Scaruzzi, and Michael Ibbetson. She subsequently brought a civil action seeking damages against the individual defendants and the Philadelphia Phillies, Inc., which was also named as a party to this action.1 The individual defendants defended, in part, by asserting that T.G. consented to sexual activities with them and, therefore, there was no sexual assault. There is no dispute that, given T.G.’s age, 11, consent would not be available as…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Congini by Congini v. PORTERSVILLE ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Dalrymple v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Young v. Commonwealth Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Alumni Ass'n v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Walters v. UPMC Presbyterian ShadysideSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Martin-Mcfarlane v. City of Phila.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Douglas v. Brookville Area School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Cooper ex rel. Cooper v. Lankenau HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Dorley v. South Fayette Township School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API