Legal Opinion

Besing v. Vanden Eykel

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided March 23, 1994No. 05-93-00756-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Justice.

This appeal arises from Besing’s second legal malpractice suit against appellees. 1 In Besing’s first suit (Besing I), the trial court granted appellees summary judgment on limitations. Besing appealed that judgment to this court. We affirmed the trial court’s judgment. See Besing v. Seeligson, Douglass, Falconer & Vanden Eykel, 822 S.W.2d 107 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1991, writ denied).

In an amended motion for rehearing in this court, Besing claimed the Texas Supreme Court’s decision in Hughes v. Mahaney & Higgins, 821 S.W.2d 154 (Tex.1992), tolled the statute of limitations.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Barr v. Resolution Trust Corp. Ex Rel. Sunbelt Federal SavingsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Hughes v. Mahaney & HigginsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Atkins v. CroslandTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Cowling v. ColliganTexas Supreme Court · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Igal v. Brightstar Information Technology Group, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Dear v. Scottsdale Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
  3. Collins v. Sandy City Board of AdjustmentUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Brown v. Henderson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
  5. Calabrian Corporation v. Alliance Specialty Chemicals, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API