Legal Opinion

Barr v. Resolution Trust Corp. Ex Rel. Sunbelt Federal Savings

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1992No. D-2082PublishedCited by 829 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GONZALEZ, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether a claim by Sunbelt Federal Savings against George Barr based on a partnership promissory note and guarantee agreement is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. The trial court granted Barr’s motion for summary judgment based on res judicata. The court of appeals, with one Justice dissenting, reversed the trial court’s judgment, holding that the doctrine did not apply. 824 S.W.2d 600. We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

In 1985, Barr and Ron Knott were partners in the Bar III Venture.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bonniwell v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Texas Water Rights Commission v. Crow Iron WorksTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Hanrick v. GurleyTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Freeman v. McAninchTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Ogletree v. CratesTexas Supreme Court · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by829 opinions

  1. Amstadt v. United States Brass Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Twyman v. TwymanTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Getty Oil Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 2004

824 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API