Legal Opinion
Collins v. Sandy City Board of Adjustment
Utah Supreme Court
Decided August 2, 2002No. 20010144PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Certiorari to the Utah Court of Appeals
DURRANT, Associate Chief Justice:
11 On certiorari, petitioners John and June Collins (the "Collinses") seek review of Collins v. Sandy City Board of Adjustment, 2000 UT App. 371, 16 P.3d 1251. In that decision, the Utah Court of Appeals concluded that the Collinses' suit was barred by principles of issue preclusion because they had previously litigated the same issue in an earlier case and failed to appeal. The Col-linses argue that because of an intervening change in the law, their suit is not barred on issue preclusion grounds. Because we conclude…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reed v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Higgins v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DuelSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- Oman v. Davis School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Grynberg v. Questar Pipeline Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
- Pacific Frontier v. Pleasant Grove CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Jensen Ex Rel. Jensen v. CunninghamUtah Supreme Court · 2011
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.