Legal Opinion
Dear v. Scottsdale Insurance Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided March 13, 1997No. 05-95-00705-CVPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
HANKINSON, Justice.
On our own motion, we withdraw our November 1, 1996 opinion and substitute this opinion. We also vacate our November 1, 1996 judgment.
William C. Dear and William C. Dear & Associates, Inc. (collectively referred to as Dear”) appeal the grant of summary judgments in favor of Scottsdale Insurance Company (“Scottsdale”), Hammerman & Gainer, Inc. (“H & G”), and Paul B. Van Ness (“Van Ness”) and Johnson & Sylvan, P.C. In the trial court, Dear alleged that appellees improperly investigated, handled, and settled lawsuits filed against Dear, which…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Natividad v. Alexsis, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
- Renfro Drug Co. v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Apex Towing Co. v. TolinTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Robert Lodholtz v. York Risk Services Group, IncoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Sanchez v. Lindsey Morden Claims Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH v. BROTHERHOOD MUTUAL INSURANCE SERVICES, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Charleston Dry Cleaners & Laundry, Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.