Ettinger v. Triangle-Pacific Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
TODD, J.:
¶ 1 This personal injury action arises out of an injury suffered in a fall by Appellant Boyd E. Ettinger (“Ettinger”) while he was working as an electrician at a manufacturing plant that was under reconstruction. Ettinger and his wife, Esther E. Ettinger, appeal the judgment1 in favor of *99Appellee Production Systems Incorporated (“PSI”)2 and present a question of first impression to this Court. We are asked to determine, inter alia, whether an item that is being assembled by its producer is a “product” and whether one of its assemblers is a “user” under Section 402A of the Restatement…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Johnston the Florist, Inc. v. TEDCO Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. RobertsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Trombetta v. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- American Future System, Inc. v. Better Business Bureau of Eastern PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.